It’s been abundantly clear from the beginning of his term as governor of Nevada that Sisolak has been nothing but a thorn in the heel of upstanding, patriotic citizens in Nevada. His tyrannical rule over the state threatens the God-given rights of the people he wants to see suffer needlessly. The most egregious of his pre-Chinese Virus actions was the signing of a bill that affects the divine right to bear arms.
The Second Amendment’s Promises
The exact text of the second amendment is as follows: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” While the text was written in a time when the only firearms available had a firing rate of maybe one or two shots per minute, the letter of the law does not specify any sort of restrictions on the arms that we, the righteous American race, are allowed to bear.
According to this law, and pursuant to the 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller, the Second Amendment protects an individual’s rights to own a firearm even when unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for what was termed “traditionally lawful” purposes like self-defense. Since the amendment creates an individual Constitutional right for each American, that means that individual legislative bodies are supposed to be prevented from prohibiting possession of literally any weapon we could want, so long as the purpose for the possession thereof is lawful in nature.
So, why does the fraud Sisolak want to take away your guns?
Sisolak’s Unpatriotic Reasoning
The only way to prevent mass shootings is to arm the citizens. Granted, this would not have helped at all during the October 1 shooting in Las Vegas, when some wackjob had a bunch of guns up in a hotel room and shot up the Route 91 Music Festival, or indeed most of the other mass shootings that happened in America, but the fact remains that if someone comes into a room with a gun and everyone else in the room also has guns, there will likely be much less of a confrontation.
Sisolak signed a bill into state law that followed the federal law of outlawing innocuous firearm add-ons like bump stocks and also any firearm that’s been modified to have an automatic firing capability. The law he signed is basically trying to outlaw people from having guns that can fire too quickly, but what’s the point of this aside from trying to garner political clout?
Sisolak’s virtue signaling is stark. “A mass shooting happened, so we need to make sure that law-abiding patriots can’t have the guns that the Constitution promises them. See how progressive I am in my legislation?” If someone with a gun wants to do harm to a group of people, then they are going to do it, regardless of whether it’s been modified to fire at an automatic rate or not. Nothing’s going to stop someone from getting a weapon illegally and doing illegal actions with it if that’s what they want to do.
So What Do We Do?
So the solution should not be more gun control! If we let Sisolak’s virtue-signaling soft-belly Democratic sentiments continue to sign into effect laws like this one, then he’s going to try to take away the right to bear arms. The government cannot under any circumstance be the only entity with weaponry, because then we’re right back to where we started with the redcoats.
Recall Sisolak from his governmental position. We need to organize and take this matter to the state capitol, and demand that Sisolak step down from his ill-gotten post and let someone with real American values lead this great state! I’m Rob Raskins, and I have a social media platform that’s for patriots ONLY. Join me and others at proamericaonly.org and help recall this sham of a governor!